A well-organized network of organizations is fighting plastic pollution solutions using similar ploys around the world, according to “
Talking Trash: The Corporate Playbook of False Solutions,” a report from The Changing Markets Foundation. The 98-page report looks at actions by the top 10 plastic polluters as well leading NGOs and trade bodies, looking at them over time and across regions and countries.
It highlights how these strategies are used to distract consumers and governments and “delay and derail legislation” that might prevent them from growing the market for cheap, disposable plastic packaging.
None of the companies analysed – Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, Danone, Mars, Mondelēz, Nestlé, PepsiCo, Perfetti Van Melle, P&G and Unilever – come out well. Parallels with the actions of Big Tobacco are strong and the report exposes the reputational risk they face.
Across the ten, authors seediffering levels of commitment, from near zero (Perfetti Van Melle and Mondelēz International) to more impressive-sounding commitments (Unilever, Danone and Coca-Cola), but even the better ones fail to provide sufficient transparency and often act in unethical ways.
A study of Coca-Cola shows three decades of broken promises to reduce plastic use: it made in 1990 a commitment to make bottles with 25% recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET), but today rPET content is still only about 10%. Also, the company pledged to support 10 voluntary initiatives to solve plastic waste while being a member of at least seven trade associations that lobbied against legislation and policies seeking to prevent plastic pollution.
The authors also criticize many trade bodies that work on behalf of the companies as well as NGOs that run voluntary commitments, such as New Plastic Economy, for lacking accountability and transparency and often greenwashing companies.
Last, the report points to proven solutions – reuse and refill along with mechanical recycling – and criticizes reliance on unproven technologies such as chemical recycling that are distant from being commercially viable and come with serious environmental detriments.
[Image Credit: © The Changing Markets Foundation]