In the world of plastic packaging, the Global Commitment is a big deal, and the
latest results were just released.
Launched in 2018 by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, in collaboration with the UN Environment Programme, the Global Commitment unites “over 1,000 organisations from across the world, including businesses representing 20% of all plastic packaging produced globally and over 50 government signatories”.
It’s the primary way plastic packaging is governed. Ellen MacArthur Foundation says it brings together “businesses, governments, NGOs, and investors behind a common vision of a circular economy in which we eliminate the plastic we don’t need; innovate towards new materials and business models; and circulate all the plastic we still use, to keep it in the economy and out of the environment”.
It sounds great.
We’re five years in and its
report talks of “substantial progress” and how Global Commitment business signatories, and particularly the top quartile, have outperformed the market across nearly all target areas”. It gives various data points to support this. Here’s one:
“…through the Global Commitment, the business signatories have had a substantial collective material and climate impact. They have increased their use of recycled plastics by 1.5 million tonnes per annum… this is equivalent to keeping 1 barrel of oil in the ground every 2 seconds, or more than 15 million barrels of oil a year. Doing so also avoids 2.5 million tonnes of CO2 per year – equivalent to eliminating the carbon emissions of a city of 500,000 people. The strong growth in recycled plastics use, combined with keeping the overall growth in plastic packaging use below market average, has resulted in avoiding 2.8 million tonnes of virgin plastics production a year compared to business as usual – equivalent to more than the UK’s annual plastic packaging use."
This is impressive as far as it goes but is it really a solution to single-use plastic? The Global Commitment focuses on plastic
composition – replacing non-recyclable plastics with other plastics and replacing virgin plastic with used/recycled plastic. But it’s all plastic and almost all of it goes to waste.
OECD tell us just 10% or so of plastic gets recycled worldwide, and in nearly four decades, by 2060, it will still be only 17% in the baseline, current trends scenario. Most goes to landfill and incineration, but a chunk escapes to the environment. So how does changing the composition of plastic help?
Worse, the Global Commitment does not require signatories to set targets for overall plastic usage, which means signatories can use ever more. We see this in the data that shows total plastic use by brand and retail signatories continues to rise. Since 2018, signatories have used 63.6 million tonnes and use more each year than in 2018. In 2023, total use was 6.6% higher than in 2018. By far the majority of this is single-use plastic that is used once before going to waste.
The Global Commitment did a wonderful job galvanising support but, unfortunately, its flawed targets cannot solve the issue it highlighted, and it does a disservice by claiming ‘substantial progress’ when plastic use proceeds unabated. As ever, we need to shift to policies that make a difference, and the most attainable and meaningful is reuse (and on that, Ellen MacArthur Foundation reports that since 2019, the share of plastic that signatories say is reusable has fallen from 1.6% to 1.3% in 2023).
[Image Credit: © REUSE Foundation]